3 stripes not 4
by Steve - Posted 08 February 2012
In the recent case of Adidas v Pep Stores, the Western Cape High Court held that the famous Adidas 3 stripe branding, which is registered as a trade mark in SA, did not grant a monopoly to Adidas for the use of any number of equal distance, parallel stripes on shoes and sportware. Pep Stores had been using 2 and 4 stripes on a number of ranges.
The court applied good common sense and held that the average consumer was not likely to be confused to the point that an association may be made between Pep's footwear and Adidas' famous brand.
comments
post a comment
back to topabout the author
by the same author
latest posts
feeds
latest articles
- The layperson's guide to the Protection of Information Bill
- Preventing abuse of the new business rescue process
- Frankies v Woolies: lessons for entrepreneurs
- Companies Act update.....
- New Companies Act
latest resources
- useful guide to the new product liability provisions of the consumer protection act
- Submission on Establishment of ICASA Consumer Advisory Panel
- PVC IP Survey Report
- Viacom's complaint vs YouTube
- Google's response to Viacom's YouTube complaint
recent comments
- Thuli on STRICT LIABILITY UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL
- Val Barker on STRICT LIABILITY UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL
- Maretha du Plessis on STRICT LIABILITY UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL
- Susan on STRICT LIABILITY UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL
- Senyatse Phasha on managing internal relations in a close corporation







