Employer's risk for internet abuse - the Grobler v Naspers judgment
by default - Posted 16 June 2005
The Cape Provincial Division's landmark judgment in the case of Grobler v Naspers 2004(4) SA 220(CPD) poses some serious questions for employers facing growing internal ICT risks in their workplace.
The judgment paves the way for more and more employers to be held vicariously liability for the wrongful actions of their employees. Although the case dealt with sexual harrassment risks, the approach taken by the court will be applicable to ICT risks as well. It may no longer be enough for employers to rely on the fact that the employee was not acting in the furtherance of the employer's business, or that the employee's conduct complained of was intentional or a clear deviation from the employer's instructions. The court followed the approach adopted in other jurisdictions by looking at the risks associated with and created by the running of the employer's business. If risks are introduced which later materialise causing harm, the employer may be liable even though there is no-fault on his/her part.
comments
post a comment
back to topabout the author
No information available
by the same author
latest posts
feeds
latest articles
- The layperson's guide to the Protection of Information Bill
- Preventing abuse of the new business rescue process
- Frankies v Woolies: lessons for entrepreneurs
- Companies Act update.....
- New Companies Act
latest resources
- useful guide to the new product liability provisions of the consumer protection act
- Submission on Establishment of ICASA Consumer Advisory Panel
- PVC IP Survey Report
- Viacom's complaint vs YouTube
- Google's response to Viacom's YouTube complaint
recent comments
- Thuli on STRICT LIABILITY UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL
- Val Barker on STRICT LIABILITY UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL
- Maretha du Plessis on STRICT LIABILITY UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL
- Susan on STRICT LIABILITY UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL
- Senyatse Phasha on managing internal relations in a close corporation







